Validation of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor in maternal cardiac disease: comparison of NICOM and transthoracic echocardiogram.

BACKGROUND: The physiological changes to the cardiovascular system during pregnancy are considerable and are more pronounced in those with cardiac disease. In the general population, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring is a valid alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization, which poses risk in the pregnant population. There is limited data on noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in pregnancy as an alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare transthoracic echocardiography with a noninvasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM, Cheetah Medical) in pregnant patients with and without cardiac disease. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, open-label validation study that compared 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography with NICOM estimations of cardiac output in each trimester of pregnancy and the postpartum period. Participants with and without cardiac disease with a singleton gestation were included. NICOM estimations of cardiac output were derived from thoracic bioreactance and compared with 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography for both precision and accuracy. A mean percentage difference of ±30% between the 2 devices was considered acceptable agreement between the 2 measurement techniques. RESULTS: A total of 58 subjects were enrolled; 36 did not have cardiac disease and 22 had cardiac disease. Heart rate measurements between the 2 devices were strongly correlated in both groups, whereas stroke volume and cardiac output measurements showed weak correlation. When comparing the techniques, the NICOM device overestimated cardiac output in the control group in all trimesters and the postpartum period (mean percentage differences were 50.3%, 52.7%, 48.1%, and 51.0% in the first, second, and third trimesters and the postpartum period, respectively). In the group with cardiac disease, the mean percentage differences were 31.9%, 29.7%, 19.6%, and 35.2% for the respective timepoints. CONCLUSION: The NICOM device consistently overestimated cardiac output when compared with 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography at all timepoints in the control group and in the first trimester and postpartum period for the cardiovascular disease group. The physiological changes of pregnancy, specifically the mean chest circumference and total body water, may alter the accuracy of the cardiac output measurement by the NICOM device as they are currently estimated. Although NICOM has been validated for use in the critical care setting, there is insufficient data to support its use in pregnancy.

Patient-Perceived Satisfaction and Knowledge Uptake in a Combined Cardio-Obstetrics Clinic.

Heart disease is the leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality in the United States and has led to the development of combined cardio-obstetrics (COB) clinics as a model for prenatal care. In other areas of medicine, these types of collaborative care models have shown improvement in morbidity, mortality, and patient satisfaction. There is some data to suggest that a combined COB clinic improves maternal outcomes but there is no data to suggest patients prefer this type of care model. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction in a combined COB clinic and whether this type of model enhances perceived communication and knowledge uptake. A quality questionnaire was developed to assess patient perceptions regarding communication, satisfaction, and perceived knowledge. Patients who attended the clinic (n = 960) from 2014-2020 were contacted by email, with a response received from 119 (12.5%). Participants completed a questionnaire assessing satisfaction and perceived knowledge uptake with answers based on a Likert scale (7 representing very satisfied and 1 representing very unsatisfied). Safe and effective contraceptive use was evaluated by multiple choice options. Knowledge was also assessed by comparing contraceptive use before and after the clinic. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the clinic (6.2 ± 1.5), provider-to-patient communication (6.1 ± 1.6), and with the multidisciplinary appointment approach (6.3 ± 1.5). As well, participants reported an increase in knowledge about heart disease a result of collaborative counseling. In summary, a multidisciplinary approach to cardio-obstetrics not only improves outcomes but is a patient satisfier.

Creating a maternal cardiac center of excellence: a call to action.

In contrast to most industrialized countries, maternal mortality in the USA is rising. Cardiovascular disease, both acquired heart disease (e.g. coronary disease, arrhythmias, and heart failure), as well as congenital heart disease survivors, are all potentially important factors in explaining this worrisome trend. Increase in acquired cardiac disease is likely attributable to greater rates of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and an increase in the incidence of advanced maternal age, while congenital heart disease in pregnancy is increasing due to advances in pediatric cardiovascular surgery. Despite the growing cardiovascular risk of pregnant women, most obstetricians and cardiologists have limited experience in caring for women with heart disease. Accordingly, management is largely guided by expert opinion likely to vary greatly across centers. To address these challenges, a multidisciplinary approach to care that includes both cardiologists and obstetricians could leverage the knowledge of both specialties and support streamlined communication between the patient and her providers. Our experience highlights the necessary components and essential infrastructure for building a center of excellence in treating pregnant women with heart disease.Condensation: A guide for creating a center of excellence for prenatal care for women with cardiovascular disease.The problem: Cardiac disease is the leading cause of maternal mortality, and pregnancies affected by cardiac disease continue to rise, both congenital and acquired.The solution: Maternal fetal medicine, obstetricians, and cardiologists can join together in tertiary facilities to create Maternal Cardiac Centers of Excellence to provide multidisciplinary, structured care for these high-risk patients.

Importance of the Cardio-Obstetrics Team.

PURPOSE: In the USA, maternal mortality has been rising since the 1980s. Cardiovascular disease is recognized as the leading cause of this worrisome trend, and a multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with cardiovascular conditions during pregnancy is becoming increasingly important. We outline the literature supporting this multidisciplinary approach, highlight our center's experience in building and expanding an integrated cardio-obstetrics practice, and provide guidance regarding patient selection and management within a combined practice. Antenatal management patterns and delivery planning for patients with cardiovascular disease during pregnancy vary substantially among cardiovascular and obstetric and maternal fetal medicine practices in the USA. The need for multidisciplinary care between cardiologists and obstetricians is evident and has been supported by best practice statements from the American Heart Association, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy Study (CARPREG) investigators, whose CARPREG II risk score included "late first antenatal visit" as a predictor of adverse outcomes of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: We have solid evidence supporting a multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with cardiac conditions in pregnancy. This approach is optimal because it facilitates a consistent and clear message to the patient (and those caring for each patient) regarding management and risks associated with pregnancy, as well as subsequent risk and postpartum follow-up. We support the extension of clinical collaboration between obstetricians and cardiologists to the research realm and know that working together to investigate the outcomes of moms with heart conditions and their babies will provide clinically meaningful information to support the care of these unique patients.

Maternal Mortality in the United States and the HOPE Registry.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Maternal mortality in the United States is highest among all developed nations and continues to rise. The leading cause of morbidity and mortality during pregnancy and the postpartum period is cardiovascular disease. While there are large European and Canadian studies exploring the care and outcomes of moms with heart disease in pregnancy, there are no large prospective studies to guide the care of this growing group of patients in the US. We review the current approach to the management of patients with heart disease in pregnancy and the gaps in knowledge thereof. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, antenatal management and delivery planning are highly variable for patients with heart disease in pregnancy and maternal risk models' application to the US patient population is limited by their derivation from an international cohort of patients and their focus on patients with congenital heart disease. As the need for interdisciplinary care between cardiologists and obstetricians becomes evident, and as broad research efforts within this space are very much needed, we propose a research collaborative called the Heart Outcomes in Pregnancy: Expectations (HOPE) for Mom and Baby Registry. The HOPE Registry aims to address key clinical questions surrounding the preconception period, antenatal care, delivery planning and outcomes, and long-term postpartum care and outcomes of these unique patients. We have made progress in recent years by recognizing the clinical need to address and standardize the management of patients with heart disease in pregnancy. We now must initiate and propel US-based cardio-obstetrics research to address key gaps in knowledge and variability in the care of patients with heart disease in pregnancy.

Echocardiographic and radiographic changes associated with systemic hypertension in cats.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of systemic hypertension (SHT) on echocardiographic and radiographic cardiovascular variables in affected cats compared with healthy geriatric cats. Secondary objectives were to determine whether there were any relationships between these findings and age or systolic blood pressure (SBP). Fifteen healthy cats (>8 years of age with normal SBP) and 15 hypertensive cats (SBP > 180 mm Hg) were studied. Each cat was evaluated for standard echocardiographic parameters and 4 different aortic root dimensions. Seventeen variables were measured from right lateral and dorsoventral radiographic views. Left ventricle wall thickness was greater in the SHT group (5.1 +/- 0.9 mm) than in the healthy cats (4.2 +/- 0.5 mm). Left ventricular hypertrophy in the SHT cats often was not severe, and mean measures were considered normal. Some cats had asymmetrical septal hypertrophy (ASH) in the basilar portion of the septum as determined from the 2-dimensional view of the left ventricular outflow tract. ASH was greater in cats with SHT. Comparisons of the proximal ascending aorta indicated the presence of dilatation in the SHT cats, and comparison of the ascending aorta to the aortic annulus was helpful in differentiating between the 2 groups. The distal aortic root measurements and ratios evaluated by echocardiography were significantly different between the 2 groups of cats (P = .0001) and were significantly correlated with SBP (P = .0001) but not age (P > .3).